If I commented on your profile/"artwork" that you should tag it properly as AI and you're mad and now checking my profile: Hi ♥ I'm heavily against non-properly tagged AI art and other creations! Please tag it accordingly and be done with it, nobody likes your way of doing things like this.
--------------------
Host-Admin of ponysfm.com
Mostly searching for new creations to add to PonySFM from DeviantArt!
If you want to contact me feel free to do so!
For all other contacts: epiclper.com
--------------------
💗Thank you for watching💗
Hello! Thank you for watching o/
Thanks for faving :)
Just wanted to say here that I did leave a comment replying to the other person here: https://www.deviantart.com/comments/4/86817231/5123843987
In your defense, telling them how ridiculous it was for them to make a personal jab at your gallery for being of a particular subject, as if theirs couldn't also be described as someone using existing materials to make a bunch of images of their special interest (and I didn't say this there to keep my tone respectful and meet them halfway for a discussion, but gmod images take time and effort and are made using resources that people have created for that use willingly so I don't actually consider them the same at all, lol).
I also tried to argue that their comparison of AI image generation to being a director doesn't stick, as directors tend to compensate and credit the people whose work they use. While dreamup is better than other AI image generators for ethical data collection, it isn't perfect and most people who use them just don't care anyway, which is where the vitriol against AI mostly comes from.
As if to confirm that they are one such person who doesn't care about the ethics of any of it and has no argument against this fact, the AI image creator who owns the profile deleted my comment and blocked me so it's gone now. I assume yours is only left up as well so people can see the replies in their favour.
If you don't want the drama spilling over to your own profile I understand, feel free to delete this comment (will probably do so myself in due time). I wanted to reply here just so you, and anyone else who comes your way from that drama, can know people probably are defending you but it's getting deleted by the profile owner.
Heya, no problem at all, the comment can stay of course
Copy/Pasting another comment I wrote below this one here too since it's relevant:
"Oi, no problem I have nothing against AI art in general, but the users behind them. Trying to deceive people into thinking they're a real artist while all they do is put in a few curated words and, if at all, slightly touching up the result in Photoshop is not at all an artist to me. Those with real skills who draw everything from scratch and have built their skills over potential decades even are the ones who deserve the credit, not some random AI bros trying to fish for money.
I won't ever back down from from this standpoint, no matter how hard platforms try to push AI stuff."
My issue with AI is simply the ethics of how it could not exist without utilising the existing work of human artists that it scrapes, most of it non-ethically - where's their cut of the $12,000 that featured user made by typing words into a box, y'know?
And of course, for human artists, it's frustrating to see them suggest that their work is hard simply because they have to pull the slot machine crank over and over again while adjusting words here and there to get something that looks passable (but almost never stands up to scrutiny, the amount of belt buckles and jewelery and background details in all these elaborate AI fantasy artworks that are just smears and squiggles when you actually look at them - and not by choice like some artists might do for simplification and avoiding distraction's sake, these details are like that in AI art because the prompters have no control over it). Generating a hundred images to get one that looks good enough isn't work, it's a gambling addiction.